2015年11月12日 星期四

week-3 美國同志婚姻合法

Same sex marriage is now legal in the entire US after a Supreme Court ruling striking down state marriage bans.

The ruling means all US states must grant marriage licences to gay and lesbian couples and recognize marriages that have taken place in other states.

So how did we get to this point?

One of the first couples to wed in Massachusetts

In 1996, the US Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act, a law that prohibited federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
In 2003, Massachusetts judges ruled the state constitution allowed gay marriage, and marriage licences followed shortly after that. In the following years, a handful of states passed gay marriage bans while others began working towards allowing same-sex unions - either by court order or legislation.
One high-profile ban occurred by referendum in California in 2008 after courts had previously allowed same-sex marriage.
This continued across the US until the Supreme Court heard a challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act in 2013.

What did justices have to decide in this case?

Jim Obergefell brought a lawsuit against the state of Ohio after the state refused to recognize his marriage to his late husband

The justices, who had previously stopped short of resolving the question of same-sex marriage nationally, had to consider whether or not states were constitutionally required to issue marriage licences and if states were required to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.

How many states previously allowed same-sex unions?

Before the ruling, 36 states were issuing marriage licences to same-sex couples, as well as Washington DC, which sets its own marriage laws but is not legally a state.

A referendum on gay marriage in California in 2008 put the legal status of previously performed marriages in question

A critical turning point came in October 2014, when the Supreme Court chose not to hear appeals against lower court rulings that had overturned same-sex marriage bans - expanding the legality of gay unions to many more states.
In other states, same-sex marriage has been approved either through legislation or voter referenda.
Michigan couples were briefly able to marry before a court stayed a ruling overturning its ban.

What have been the key Supreme Court rulings?

On 6 October 2014, the court turned away appeals from five states with gay marriage bans on the books that had challenged court rulings overturning those bans.
In challenging the gay marriage bans, proponents relied on a 2013 Supreme Court ruling in the case of United States v Windsor.

Edith Windsor was the plaintiff in the last gay marriage case at the Supreme Court

In that case, the court overturned the Defense of Marriage Act (Doma), which barred the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages.
Under Doma, for example, individuals in same-sex marriages were ineligible for benefits from federal programs such as the Social Security pension system and some tax allowances if their partners died.
Another key case, Hollingsworth v Perry of 2013, was filed by two lawyers, Theodore Olson and David Boies, working together on behalf of their California clients, Kristin Perry and Sandra Stier and another couple, Jeffrey Zarrillo and Paul Katami.
They argued that the Supreme Court should strike down a state law, called Proposition 8, which stated that marriage is between a man and a woman. The law, approved by California voters in 2008, overrode a state Supreme Court decision that allowed for same-sex marriage.

What is next?


Marriages will continue as before in the 36 states. The remaining states will have to issue licences, although it is unclear how long they have to comply with the court's ruling. However, there were reports of court clerk offering licences only an hour after the Supreme Court decision.



Structure of The Lead:
WHO- supreme court
WHERE- the entire US
WHEN-  not given
WHY-  grant the gay and lesbian marriage licences
WHAT- to legalize the gay marriage
HOW- not given

Keywords:
1. referenda  複決(referendum 的複數)
2. high-profile  備受矚目的
3. strike down  打倒
4. in question  談到的;爭論中的
5. proponent  支持者
6. barred 禁止 
7. on behalf of  代表
8. federal program  聯邦程序
9. appeal against  針對上訴
10. act  法案


4 則留言:

  1. Although everyone has different opinion to this issue. We should respect everyone's aptitude. And this is an important act to those same sex couples. Last time, when we talked about this issue on the citizen class, we watched Jolin's video. The content touched my heart. Now, they can get married. If, their mate was sick, they could deal with by self. It is a good news to them. Bless them!

    回覆刪除
  2. I will respect everyone's different opinions, but in my opinion, I don't agree with same sex marriage. Everyone were created to love opposite sex. So it's not natural. I can't change others choice, but I just do my own business.

    回覆刪除
  3. Every one now has his or her own right to stand for this issue,and I think love is equal to everyone no matter who you are.The world needs more love and respect so as to bring out a peaceful world for us.

    回覆刪除
  4. Every one now has his or her own right to stand for this issue,and I think love is equal to everyone no matter who you are.Do not discriminate others that you think they do the wrong things,because all the things that you think is right doesn't mean you are exactly right. The world needs more love and respect so as to bring out a peaceful world for us.

    回覆刪除